{mailer issue} Fwd: Re: Request for approval: 7190219 (bf) CharBuffer.put(String, int, int) modifies position even if BufferOverflowException thrown

[David Holmes]

I got two copies of your email. This one showed the cc list (hence they 
are present in my reply-to-all). The other did not.

David

On 5/09/2012 6:21 PM, Seán Coffey wrote:
> that's  interesting. I see Alan and myself cc'ed on the mail that Tim
> sent (headers below)
> It's like the mailer tweaks the mail per recipient then. Still strange!
>
> regards,
> Sean.
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Received: 	from [10.132.188.27] (/10.132.188.27) by default (Oracle
> Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 10:24:12 -0700
> Message-ID: 	<50463932.1030803 at oracle.com>
> Date: 	Tue, 04 Sep 2012 10:24:02 -0700
> From: 	Tim Bell <tim.bell at oracle.com>
> User-Agent: 	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; SunOS i86pc; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615
> Thunderbird/13.0.1
> MIME-Version: 	1.0
> To: 	jdk7u-dev at openjdk.java.net
> CC: 	Seán Coffey <sean.coffey at oracle.com>, Alan Bateman
> <Alan.Bateman at oracle.com>
> Subject: 	Re: {mailer issue} Fwd: Re: Request for approval: 7190219 (bf)
> CharBuffer.put(String, int, int) modifies position even if
> BufferOverflowException thrown
> References: 	<5045FA2D.5050801 at oracle.com> <5045FC16.2040007 at oracle.com>
> In-Reply-To: 	<5045FC16.2040007 at oracle.com>
> Content-Type: 	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 	8bit
>
>
>
>
> On 05/09/2012 02:14, David Holmes wrote:
>>
>> The email Tim sent in which he states he cc'd people, does not show
>> any cc's. I have noticed this myself when posting to multiple lists
>> and also cc'ing people - some the list mails show the cc list and
>> others do not. So I assume this is a property of each list?
>>
>> David
>>
>>> regards,
>>> Sean.
>>>
>>> On 04/09/2012 18:24, Tim Bell wrote:
>>>> Hi Seán:
>>>>
>>>>> On a totally unrelated note...
>>>>>
>>>>> I cc'ed Alan in the below email but the openJDK mailer seems to strip
>>>>> out cc recipients if they're on the openJDK alias. (from what I can
>>>>> make out) - This doesn't help folks who might have filters set up for
>>>>> "to or cc:" fields.
>>>>>
>>>>> any ideas on whether this can be changed ? I'm not sure if it was
>>>>> always happening. I've only seen it occur in past ~1-2 months.
>>>>
>>>> In Mailman terminology, this is called "nodupes -- Does the member
>>>> want to avoid duplicates of the same message?"
>>>>
>>>> This setting is controlled by each user for each list they join.
>>>> Taking the jdk7u-dev list as an example, both you and Alan have ticked
>>>> the box for 'nodupes' which means you should only get one copy of my
>>>> reply here, even though I explicitly added you as CC: addressees.
>>>>
>>>> If a list user wants to see _all_ email, they should double check
>>>> their settings for the 'not metoo' and 'nodupes' options in their
>>>> mailman configuration.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> For more information, check the GNU Mailman - List Member Manual:
>>>> http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-member/mailman-member.html
>>>>
>>>> Regards-
>>>>
>>>> Tim
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> regards,
>>>>> Sean.
>>>>>
>>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>>> Subject: Re: Request for approval: 7190219 (bf)
>>>>> CharBuffer.put(String, int, int) modifies position even if
>>>>> BufferOverflowException thrown
>>>>> Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 13:55:09 +0100
>>>>> From: Seán Coffey <sean.coffey at oracle.com>
>>>>> To: Neil Richards <neil.richards at ngmr.net>
>>>>> CC: jdk7u-dev at openjdk.java.net
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey Neil,
>>>>>
>>>>> I wouldn't regard this as a risky fix and don't see a problem with it
>>>>> going into jdk7u-dev now (before phase2 approval process begins in mid
>>>>> September) It also benefits from having a unit testcase. Testing
>>>>> (jtreg
>>>>> tests) in the jdk8/tl repos would have occurred on a regular basis
>>>>> also
>>>>> since the fix was push there.
>>>>>
>>>>> Alan was initial reviewer and may wish to comment (cc'ed)
>>>>>
>>>>> regards,
>>>>> Sean.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 04/09/2012 13:30, Neil Richards wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 09:58 +0100, Seán Coffey wrote:
>>>>>>> Approved for jdk7u-dev. (7u10)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've created a bug record for this and will mark as fixed once I see
>>>>>>> your push.
>>>>>>> cc'ing initial reviewer also.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> regards,
>>>>>>> Sean.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 03/09/2012 05:18, Jonathan Lu wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi folks,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here's a request of porting the fix of 7190219 back to JDK7, could
>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> please review it?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bug: http://bugs.sun.com/view_bug.do?bug_id=7190219
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Change set: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/tl/jdk/rev/bf0c6f91bc22
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thread where it was reviewed:
>>>>>>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2012-August/011087.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Jonathan
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Sean,
>>>>>> It looks like this changeset has not yet been promoted from the
>>>>>> component (tl) forest to the master jdk8 repository.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please confirm, in light of this, if you'd like this change to be
>>>>>> applied to jdk7u at this point, or if you would like it to spend some
>>>>>> (more) time being proved in the jdk8 stream prior to this happening.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Neil
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>