PING 2: [7u80] Request for review for CR 4963723: Implement SHA-224

Andrew Hughes gnu.andrew at redhat.com
Tue Dec 23 16:13:24 UTC 2014


----- Original Message -----
> Valerie Peng (original author) is probably best suited to reviewing this
> but I think she's out of the office the moment and back next week. Let's
> hope we can get an update/review then.
> 

Hi,

Any movement on this? It's been three months.

Thanks.

> regards,
> Sean.
> 
> On 01/10/2014 16:11, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >>> Code changes generally require two approvals: codereview, performed by a
> >>> reviewer, (in this case from security-dev) and push approval, performed
> >>> by a gatekeeper. Given your email template matches the push approval
> >>> template I understood that you intended the latter. Generally speaking
> >>> codereview requests would say "Request for review" as opposed to
> >>> "Request for approval" so a reviewer could overlook your mail if you
> >>> intended the former.
> >>>
> >>>       -Rob
> >>>
> >>> On 18/09/14 00:21, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> >>>> ----- Original Message -----
> >>>>> Hi Andrew,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Sorry to be a pest, but given the scope of the change I'd feel more
> >>>>> comfortable with an explicit codereview for the backport.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>        -Rob
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 17/09/14 18:32, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> >>>>>> This is the first of three backports to 7u designed to retain SSL
> >>>>>> compatibility with servers implemented in other languages switching
> >>>>>> to larger key sizes (notably DH >=2048 in Apache 2.4.7 [0]).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This patch is a per-requisite of the patch which brings NSA Suite B
> >>>>>> support to 7. It applies largely unchanged, bar the following:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> * Copyright header adjustment
> >>>>>> * Removal of change to java.security.spec.MGF1ParameterSpec to avoid
> >>>>>> introducing a new public variable. The SHA-224 variant is constructed
> >>>>>> directly in com.sun.crypto.provider.OAEPParameters instead.
> >>>>>> * A change to OAEPParameters is dropped as it was already incorporated
> >>>>>> in the backport of 7180907 & 8049480 (addition of SHA-224 to
> >>>>>> convertToStandardName)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-4963723
> >>>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/jdk7u/4963723/webrev.01/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> [0] https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_ssl.html
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Ok to push?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Which is what I asked for, no?
> >>>>
> >>>> If I wasn't waiting on a review first, I'd have pushed the change.
> >>>
> >> This was the only applicable template on:
> >>
> >> http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7u/
> >>
> >> Anyway, now including security-dev for review.
> >> --
> >> Andrew :)
> >>
> >> Free Java Software Engineer
> >> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
> >>
> >> PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
> >> Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F  8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
> >>
> >>
> > Ping. Any movement on this?
> 
> 

-- 
Andrew :)

Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F  8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07



More information about the jdk7u-dev mailing list