PING 2: [7u80] Request for review for CR 4963723: Implement SHA-224
dalibor.topic at oracle.com
dalibor.topic at oracle.com
Tue Dec 23 16:52:19 UTC 2014
Considering that the issue was a P3 RFE rather than a high priority bug fix, it's not clear to me why it would be necessary to backport it into 7u80, at the end point in the release cycle.
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214<tel:+494089091214> | Mobile:+491737185961<tel:+491737185961>
Oracle Java Platform Group
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwaltung: Riesstr. 25, D-80992 München
Registergericht: Amtsgericht München, HRA 95603
Geschäftsführer: Jürgen Kunz
Komplementärin: ORACLE Deutschland Verwaltung B.V.
Hertogswetering 163/167, 3543 AS Utrecht, Niederlande
Handelsregister der Handelskammer Midden-Niederlande, Nr. 30143697
Geschäftsführer: Alexander van der Ven, Astrid Kepper, Val Maher
Green Oracle <http://www.oracle.com/commitment> Oracle is committed to developing practices and products that help protect the environment
> On 23.12.2014, at 17:13, Andrew Hughes <gnu.andrew at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> Valerie Peng (original author) is probably best suited to reviewing this
>> but I think she's out of the office the moment and back next week. Let's
>> hope we can get an update/review then.
>
> Hi,
>
> Any movement on this? It's been three months.
>
> Thanks.
>
>> regards,
>> Sean.
>>
>>> On 01/10/2014 16:11, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>> Code changes generally require two approvals: codereview, performed by a
>>>>> reviewer, (in this case from security-dev) and push approval, performed
>>>>> by a gatekeeper. Given your email template matches the push approval
>>>>> template I understood that you intended the latter. Generally speaking
>>>>> codereview requests would say "Request for review" as opposed to
>>>>> "Request for approval" so a reviewer could overlook your mail if you
>>>>> intended the former.
>>>>>
>>>>> -Rob
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 18/09/14 00:21, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>>>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>>>>> Hi Andrew,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry to be a pest, but given the scope of the change I'd feel more
>>>>>>> comfortable with an explicit codereview for the backport.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Rob
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 17/09/14 18:32, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>>>>>>>> This is the first of three backports to 7u designed to retain SSL
>>>>>>>> compatibility with servers implemented in other languages switching
>>>>>>>> to larger key sizes (notably DH >=2048 in Apache 2.4.7 [0]).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This patch is a per-requisite of the patch which brings NSA Suite B
>>>>>>>> support to 7. It applies largely unchanged, bar the following:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> * Copyright header adjustment
>>>>>>>> * Removal of change to java.security.spec.MGF1ParameterSpec to avoid
>>>>>>>> introducing a new public variable. The SHA-224 variant is constructed
>>>>>>>> directly in com.sun.crypto.provider.OAEPParameters instead.
>>>>>>>> * A change to OAEPParameters is dropped as it was already incorporated
>>>>>>>> in the backport of 7180907 & 8049480 (addition of SHA-224 to
>>>>>>>> convertToStandardName)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-4963723
>>>>>>>> Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~andrew/jdk7u/4963723/webrev.01/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [0] https://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_ssl.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ok to push?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Which is what I asked for, no?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If I wasn't waiting on a review first, I'd have pushed the change.
>>>> This was the only applicable template on:
>>>>
>>>> http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk7u/
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, now including security-dev for review.
>>>> --
>>>> Andrew :)
>>>>
>>>> Free Java Software Engineer
>>>> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>>>>
>>>> PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
>>>> Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
>>> Ping. Any movement on this?
>
> --
> Andrew :)
>
> Free Java Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>
> PGP Key: 248BDC07 (https://keys.indymedia.org/)
> Fingerprint = EC5A 1F5E C0AD 1D15 8F1F 8F91 3B96 A578 248B DC07
>
More information about the jdk7u-dev
mailing list