[8u-dev] Request for approval: 6545422: TEST BUG: NativeErrors.java uses wrong path name in exec
Ivan Gerasimov
ivan.gerasimov at oracle.com
Tue Jul 1 21:32:33 UTC 2014
Corrected the subject line: I'm requesting an approval to push the fix
into jdk8u-dev repo, not jdk8u20
On 02.07.2014 1:29, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm rerequesting an approval to backport this test fix into jdk8u.
> To address the issue with NoClassDefFoundError I added the implicit
> @build line to the test (as it was done in JDK-8043520).
>
> BUGURL: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6545422
> WEBREV: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~igerasim/6545422/0/webrev/
> Jdk9 change: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/efeab0eae50f
> Review:
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2014-February/014152.html
>
> Would you please approve the backport?
>
> Sincerely yours,
> Ivan
>
> On 24.02.2014 13:15, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
>>
>> On 24.02.2014 13:03, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>> On 24/02/2014 08:56, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
>>>> Hello!
>>>>
>>>> Would you please approve porting back this test bug fix?
>>>> The fix applies cleanly to jdk8u.
>>>>
>>>> Master Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6545422
>>>> Jdk9 change: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/efeab0eae50f
>>>> Review:
>>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2014-February/014152.html
>>> Ivan - would it be possible to hold back on this one for a bit. The
>>> updated test is dependent on implicit compilation of the classes in
>>> the @library and this is causing problems for concurrent test runs.
>>> The same pattern has slipped into 15-20 other tests with the result
>>> that they all fail intermittently due to NoClassDefFoundError
>>> issues. I think they should be fixed in jdk9-dev but any of these
>>> "improved" tests are backported.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, sure!
>> Actually, I was going to port this fix into jdk6 (the test fails
>> there), but modified in such a way that it does not depend on
>> testlibrary.
>> I can still work on jdk6 port without first integrating it into jdk8u
>> and jdk7u.
>>
>> Sincerely yours,
>> Ivan
>>
>>
>>> -Alan.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
More information about the jdk8u-dev
mailing list