[8u-dev] Request for approval: 6545422: TEST BUG: NativeErrors.java uses wrong path name in exec

Seán Coffey sean.coffey at oracle.com
Mon Jul 7 09:49:49 UTC 2014


Approved.

regards,
Sean.

On 01/07/14 22:32, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
> Corrected the subject line: I'm requesting an approval to push the fix 
> into jdk8u-dev repo, not jdk8u20
>
> On 02.07.2014 1:29, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> I'm rerequesting an approval to backport this test fix into jdk8u.
>> To address the issue with NoClassDefFoundError I added the implicit 
>> @build line to the test (as it was done in JDK-8043520).
>>
>> BUGURL: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6545422
>> WEBREV: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~igerasim/6545422/0/webrev/
>> Jdk9 change: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/efeab0eae50f
>> Review: 
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2014-February/014152.html
>>
>> Would you please approve the backport?
>>
>> Sincerely yours,
>> Ivan
>>
>> On 24.02.2014 13:15, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
>>>
>>> On 24.02.2014 13:03, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>>> On 24/02/2014 08:56, Ivan Gerasimov wrote:
>>>>> Hello!
>>>>>
>>>>> Would you please approve porting back this test bug fix?
>>>>> The fix applies cleanly to jdk8u.
>>>>>
>>>>> Master Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6545422
>>>>> Jdk9 change: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/rev/efeab0eae50f
>>>>> Review: 
>>>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/serviceability-dev/2014-February/014152.html
>>>> Ivan - would it be possible to hold back on this one for a bit. The 
>>>> updated test is dependent on implicit compilation of the classes in 
>>>> the @library and this is causing problems for concurrent test runs. 
>>>> The same pattern has slipped into 15-20 other tests with the result 
>>>> that they all fail intermittently due to NoClassDefFoundError 
>>>> issues. I think they should be fixed in jdk9-dev but any of these 
>>>> "improved" tests are backported.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, sure!
>>> Actually, I was going to port this fix into jdk6 (the test fails 
>>> there), but modified in such a way that it does not depend on 
>>> testlibrary.
>>> I can still work on jdk6 port without first integrating it into 
>>> jdk8u and jdk7u.
>>>
>>> Sincerely yours,
>>> Ivan
>>>
>>>
>>>> -Alan.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>



More information about the jdk8u-dev mailing list