[8u20] Request for approval, backport of 8026385, 8003900, 8042440, 8038027
David DeHaven
david.dehaven at oracle.com
Thu Jul 17 19:36:05 UTC 2014
I posted a review request for 8038027 before going on vacation, I haven't had time to address any of these since getting back. The other three are ready to push, but I either need jdk8u Committer role or a sponsor :)
-DrD-
> David,
>
> these slipped by as well. What's the current status ? Do they still need to be pushed to jdk8u-dev ?
> Consider them approved. Please get a peer review just to make sure the trivial conflict for 8038027is addressed correctly.
>
> regards,
> Sean.
>
> On 12/06/2014 12:04, Rob McKenna wrote:
>> Hi David, if there are changes we generally err on the side of caution. Can you please get the new fixes reviewed?
>>
>> -Rob
>>
>> On 11/06/14 23:38, David DeHaven wrote:
>>> The following fixes have been incubating in 9 and the backports are essentially unmodified.
>>>
>>> 8026385: [macosx] (awt) setjmp/longjmp changes the process signal mask on OS X
>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/b5f284a0059b
>>>
>>>
>>> 8003900: X11 dependencies should be removed from Mac OS X build.
>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/56024e323104
>>>
>>>
>>> 8042440: awt_Plugin no longer needed
>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/75206fa5a43e
>>>
>>>
>>> 8038027: DTDBuilder should be run in headless mode
>>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/0eab6c63201d
>>>
>>>
>>> 8042440 and 8038027 have trivial conflicts due to minor surrounding differences but the actual changes are identical.
>>>
>>> I need a Committer to push for me, I have the closed source changes for 8026385 ready as well. 8042440 has changes in deploy but they were backported already.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> JPRT run resulted in 9 failures, all of which can be accounted for.
>>>
>>> Eight failures are due to:
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8040038
>>>
>>> The remaining failure is due to:
>>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8039212
>>>
>>> Neither fix has been backported to 8u yet.
>>>
>>> -DrD-
>>>
>>
>
More information about the jdk8u-dev
mailing list