[8u20] Request for approval, backport of 8026385, 8003900, 8042440, 8038027

[Seán Coffey]

David,

these slipped by as well. What's the current status ? Do they still need 
to be pushed to jdk8u-dev ?
Consider them approved. Please get a peer review just to make sure the 
trivial conflict for 8038027is addressed correctly.

regards,
Sean.

On 12/06/2014 12:04, Rob McKenna wrote:
> Hi David, if there are changes we generally err on the side of 
> caution. Can you please get the new fixes reviewed?
>
>     -Rob
>
> On 11/06/14 23:38, David DeHaven wrote:
>> The following fixes have been incubating in 9 and the backports are 
>> essentially unmodified.
>>
>> 8026385: [macosx] (awt) setjmp/longjmp changes the process signal 
>> mask on OS X
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/b5f284a0059b
>>
>>
>> 8003900: X11 dependencies should be removed from Mac OS X build.
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/56024e323104
>>
>>
>> 8042440: awt_Plugin no longer needed
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/75206fa5a43e
>>
>>
>> 8038027: DTDBuilder should be run in headless mode
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/client/jdk/rev/0eab6c63201d
>>
>>
>> 8042440 and 8038027 have trivial conflicts due to minor surrounding 
>> differences but the actual changes are identical.
>>
>> I need a Committer to push for me, I have the closed source changes 
>> for 8026385 ready as well. 8042440 has changes in deploy but they 
>> were backported already.
>>
>>
>>
>> JPRT run resulted in 9 failures, all of which can be accounted for.
>>
>> Eight failures are due to:
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8040038
>>
>> The remaining failure is due to:
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8039212
>>
>> Neither fix has been backported to 8u yet.
>>
>> -DrD-
>>
>