[8u40] Request for approval and review : 8058695: [TESTBUG] Reinvokers with arity >253 can't be cached

Konstantin Shefov konstantin.shefov at oracle.com
Thu Oct 16 08:46:41 UTC 2014


Paul,

There is indeed no difference between JDK 9 patch and 8u40 patch.
So I just need an approval to push to 8u40 in this case?

-Konstantin


On 14.10.2014 14:59, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>
> On Oct 14, 2014, at 11:44 AM, Konstantin Shefov 
> <konstantin.shefov at oracle.com <mailto:konstantin.shefov at oracle.com>> 
> wrote:
>
>> Gently reminder
>> Please, review this test bug fix backport
>>
>
> Looks ok to me, but i did not detect any difference between:
>
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/d37a314f2f64
>
> and:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kshefov/8058695/8u-dev/webrev.00/test/java/lang/invoke/LFCaching/TestMethods.java.sdiff.html 
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ekshefov/8058695/8u-dev/webrev.00/test/java/lang/invoke/LFCaching/TestMethods.java.sdiff.html>
>
> Did i miss something?
>
> Paul.
>
>> -Konstantin
>>
>> On 13.10.2014 18:24, Konstantin Shefov wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10.10.2014 13:06, Konstantin Shefov wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> Please review and approve the backport of the test bug fix to 8u40
>>>>
>>>> The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8058695
>>>> The webrev: 
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kshefov/8058695/8u-dev/webrev.00 
>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ekshefov/8058695/8u-dev/webrev.00>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> -Konstantin
>>>
>>
>



More information about the jdk8u-dev mailing list