[8u40] Request for approval and review : 8058695: [TESTBUG] Reinvokers with arity >253 can't be cached

[Seán Coffey]

On 16/10/2014 09:46, Konstantin Shefov wrote:
> Paul,
>
> There is indeed no difference between JDK 9 patch and 8u40 patch.
> So I just need an approval to push to 8u40 in this case?
Approval was given on 3rd Oct. You're clear to push to jdk8u-dev Konstantin.

regards,
Sean.

>
> -Konstantin
>
>
> On 14.10.2014 14:59, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 14, 2014, at 11:44 AM, Konstantin Shefov 
>> <konstantin.shefov at oracle.com <mailto:konstantin.shefov at oracle.com>> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Gently reminder
>>> Please, review this test bug fix backport
>>>
>>
>> Looks ok to me, but i did not detect any difference between:
>>
>> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/rev/d37a314f2f64
>>
>> and:
>>
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kshefov/8058695/8u-dev/webrev.00/test/java/lang/invoke/LFCaching/TestMethods.java.sdiff.html 
>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ekshefov/8058695/8u-dev/webrev.00/test/java/lang/invoke/LFCaching/TestMethods.java.sdiff.html> 
>>
>>
>> Did i miss something?
>>
>> Paul.
>>
>>> -Konstantin
>>>
>>> On 13.10.2014 18:24, Konstantin Shefov wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 10.10.2014 13:06, Konstantin Shefov wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> Please review and approve the backport of the test bug fix to 8u40
>>>>>
>>>>> The bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8058695
>>>>> The webrev: 
>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kshefov/8058695/8u-dev/webrev.00 
>>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ekshefov/8058695/8u-dev/webrev.00>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> -Konstantin
>>>>
>>>
>>
>