[8u-dev] Request for Approval: 6425769: Allow specifying an address to bind JMX remote connector

[Seán Coffey]

Jaroslav has informed me that CCC has been approved for the JDK 8u port. 
Consider this request approved for jdk8u-dev as a result.

On a side note, a docs sub-task should be created in the master bug to 
ensure docs get updated for this change.

Regards,
Sean.

On 02/02/2016 10:42, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
> On 2.2.2016 11:24, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> Hi Sean, Jaroslav,
>>
>> On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 13:51 +0000, Seán Coffey wrote:
>>> Severin,
>>>
>>> this will require a CCC review for jdk8u-dev. It introduces a new 
>>> system
>>> property. I'm cc'ing Jaroslav.
>>
>> Thanks for the heads-up.
>>
>>> Jaroslav, would you be willing to log a JDK 8u CCC record for this 
>>> port ?
>>
>> Was there an answer that I've missed about this?
>
> Not yet. But, yes, I am going to file the CCC request.
>
> -JB-
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Severin
>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Sean.
>>>
>>> On 29/01/16 13:27, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Please approve the following backports to 8u-dev. They are all related
>>>> to 6425769. 8145982 and 8146015 were test fixes for JDK 9 for the test
>>>> introduced with the JDK 9 fix for 6425769. Once approved, it would be
>>>> best to push everything together.
>>>>
>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6425769
>>>> Webrev: 
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-6425769/jdk8.00/
>>>> HG export patch: 
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-6425769/jdk8-exports/
>>>> Review-thread: 
>>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jmx-dev/2015-November/000873.html 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The actual fix for 6425769 is the same as in 9, but the test needed
>>>> changing since there are differences in the available test library (no
>>>> ProcessThread in JDK8 for example). It works the same way as in 9,
>>>> though.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8145982
>>>> Webrev: 
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8145982/jdk8.00/webrev/ 
>>>>
>>>> HG export patch: 
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8145982/jdk8-exports/JDK-8145982.export.jdk.patch
>>>> Review-thread: 
>>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jmx-dev/2015-December/000895.html 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Test fix. Same as in 9.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8146015
>>>> Webrev: 
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8146015/jdk8.00/webrev/ 
>>>>
>>>> HG export patch: 
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8146015/jdk8-exports/JDK-8146015.export.jdk.patch
>>>> Review-thread: 
>>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jmx-dev/2015-December/000899.html 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Test fix. It needed some changing since the change from JDK 9 used 
>>>> some
>>>> JDK 9 only features, such as
>>>> NetworkInterfaces.networkInterfaces()/NetworkInterfaces.inetAddresses() 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please let me know if there are questions. I'd need a sponsor who can
>>>> push this via JPRT.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Severin
>>>
>>
>