[8u-dev] Request for Approval: 6425769: Allow specifying an address to bind JMX remote connector

[Severin Gehwolf]

On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 12:38 +0000, Seán Coffey wrote:
> Jaroslav has informed me that CCC has been approved for the JDK 8u port. 
> Consider this request approved for jdk8u-dev as a result.

Thanks Sean, Jaroslav!

Jaroslav, would you be willing to push all the fixes together through
JPRT for me?

> On a side note, a docs sub-task should be created in the master bug to 
> ensure docs get updated for this change.

I'm not sure what this means. Shall I create that bug or somebody else?
If me, how does this work?

Thanks,
Severin

> Regards,
> Sean.
> 
> On 02/02/2016 10:42, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
> > On 2.2.2016 11:24, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > > Hi Sean, Jaroslav,
> > > 
> > > On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 13:51 +0000, Seán Coffey wrote:
> > > > Severin,
> > > > 
> > > > this will require a CCC review for jdk8u-dev. It introduces a new 
> > > > system
> > > > property. I'm cc'ing Jaroslav.
> > > 
> > > Thanks for the heads-up.
> > > 
> > > > Jaroslav, would you be willing to log a JDK 8u CCC record for this 
> > > > port ?
> > > 
> > > Was there an answer that I've missed about this?
> > 
> > Not yet. But, yes, I am going to file the CCC request.
> > 
> > -JB-
> > 
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Severin
> > > 
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Sean.
> > > > 
> > > > On 29/01/16 13:27, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > 
> > > > > Please approve the following backports to 8u-dev. They are all related
> > > > > to 6425769. 8145982 and 8146015 were test fixes for JDK 9 for the test
> > > > > introduced with the JDK 9 fix for 6425769. Once approved, it would be
> > > > > best to push everything together.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6425769
> > > > > Webrev: 
> > > > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-6425769/jdk8.00/
> > > > > HG export patch: 
> > > > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-6425769/jdk8-exports/
> > > > > Review-thread: 
> > > > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jmx-dev/2015-November/000873.html 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > The actual fix for 6425769 is the same as in 9, but the test needed
> > > > > changing since there are differences in the available test library (no
> > > > > ProcessThread in JDK8 for example). It works the same way as in 9,
> > > > > though.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8145982
> > > > > Webrev: 
> > > > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8145982/jdk8.00/webrev/ 
> > > > > 
> > > > > HG export patch: 
> > > > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8145982/jdk8-exports/JDK-8145982.export.jdk.patch
> > > > > Review-thread: 
> > > > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jmx-dev/2015-December/000895.html 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Test fix. Same as in 9.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8146015
> > > > > Webrev: 
> > > > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8146015/jdk8.00/webrev/ 
> > > > > 
> > > > > HG export patch: 
> > > > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8146015/jdk8-exports/JDK-8146015.export.jdk.patch
> > > > > Review-thread: 
> > > > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jmx-dev/2015-December/000899.html 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Test fix. It needed some changing since the change from JDK 9 used 
> > > > > some
> > > > > JDK 9 only features, such as
> > > > > NetworkInterfaces.networkInterfaces()/NetworkInterfaces.inetAddresses() 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Please let me know if there are questions. I'd need a sponsor who can
> > > > > push this via JPRT.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Severin
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
>