[8u-dev] Request for Approval: 6425769: Allow specifying an address to bind JMX remote connector

[Jaroslav Bachorik]

On 11.2.2016 14:36, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 12:38 +0000, Seán Coffey wrote:
>> Jaroslav has informed me that CCC has been approved for the JDK 8u port.
>> Consider this request approved for jdk8u-dev as a result.
>
> Thanks Sean, Jaroslav!
>
> Jaroslav, would you be willing to push all the fixes together through
> JPRT for me?

Working on it.

>
>> On a side note, a docs sub-task should be created in the master bug to
>> ensure docs get updated for this change.
>
> I'm not sure what this means. Shall I create that bug or somebody else?
> If me, how does this work?

I can do that. But it means simply creating a subtask for that issue 
mentioning that it is intended for docs - is that correct, Sean?

-JB-

>
> Thanks,
> Severin
>
>> Regards,
>> Sean.
>>
>> On 02/02/2016 10:42, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
>>> On 2.2.2016 11:24, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>>>> Hi Sean, Jaroslav,
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 13:51 +0000, Seán Coffey wrote:
>>>>> Severin,
>>>>>
>>>>> this will require a CCC review for jdk8u-dev. It introduces a new
>>>>> system
>>>>> property. I'm cc'ing Jaroslav.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the heads-up.
>>>>
>>>>> Jaroslav, would you be willing to log a JDK 8u CCC record for this
>>>>> port ?
>>>>
>>>> Was there an answer that I've missed about this?
>>>
>>> Not yet. But, yes, I am going to file the CCC request.
>>>
>>> -JB-
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Severin
>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Sean.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 29/01/16 13:27, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please approve the following backports to 8u-dev. They are all related
>>>>>> to 6425769. 8145982 and 8146015 were test fixes for JDK 9 for the test
>>>>>> introduced with the JDK 9 fix for 6425769. Once approved, it would be
>>>>>> best to push everything together.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-6425769
>>>>>> Webrev:
>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-6425769/jdk8.00/
>>>>>> HG export patch:
>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-6425769/jdk8-exports/
>>>>>> Review-thread:
>>>>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jmx-dev/2015-November/000873.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The actual fix for 6425769 is the same as in 9, but the test needed
>>>>>> changing since there are differences in the available test library (no
>>>>>> ProcessThread in JDK8 for example). It works the same way as in 9,
>>>>>> though.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8145982
>>>>>> Webrev:
>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8145982/jdk8.00/webrev/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> HG export patch:
>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8145982/jdk8-exports/JDK-8145982.export.jdk.patch
>>>>>> Review-thread:
>>>>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jmx-dev/2015-December/000895.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Test fix. Same as in 9.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8146015
>>>>>> Webrev:
>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8146015/jdk8.00/webrev/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> HG export patch:
>>>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8146015/jdk8-exports/JDK-8146015.export.jdk.patch
>>>>>> Review-thread:
>>>>>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jmx-dev/2015-December/000899.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Test fix. It needed some changing since the change from JDK 9 used
>>>>>> some
>>>>>> JDK 9 only features, such as
>>>>>> NetworkInterfaces.networkInterfaces()/NetworkInterfaces.inetAddresses()
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please let me know if there are questions. I'd need a sponsor who can
>>>>>> push this via JPRT.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Severin
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>