[8u] Request for Approval for backport of 8175813: PPC64: "mbind: Invalid argument" when -XX:+UseNUMA is used
Rob McKenna
rob.mckenna at oracle.com
Thu Jun 1 17:37:49 UTC 2017
Nope, you're good.
Approved
-Rob
On 01/06/17 02:22, Gustavo Romero wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> On 01-06-2017 14:04, Rob McKenna wrote:
> > Does this patch apply cleanly?
>
> Yes, the patch I'm providing here [1] applies cleanly.
>
> It differs from the patch in 10 by an indentation issue and hence I requested a
> new review for [1] in the hotspot-dev [2]. Hence [1] is now reviewed.
>
> Please, let me know if any additional step is missing in the approval process.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> Regards,
> Gustavo
>
> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gromero/8175813/backport/
> [2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2017-May/027022.html
>
> > -Rob
> >
> > On 01/06/17 01:10, Gustavo Romero wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Could the following backport of 8144019 be approved please?
> >>
> >> It fixes the JVM NUMA detection on PPC64 when -XX:+UseNUMA is used.
> >>
> >> I understand that it's correct to do such a request even if at the moment the
> >> change is not in 9 as it is already in 10, accordingly to [1].
> >>
> >> bug : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8175813
> >> webrev : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gromero/8175813/backport/
> >> review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2017-May/027022.html
> >>
> >> Thank you.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Gustavo
> >>
> >> [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2017-March/006512.html
> >>
> >
>
More information about the jdk8u-dev
mailing list