[8u] Request for Approval for backport of 8175813: PPC64: "mbind: Invalid argument" when -XX:+UseNUMA is used

[Gustavo Romero]

Thanks, Rob.

I need a sponsor for that change. Could someone sponsor it please?


Regards,
Gustavo

On 01-06-2017 14:37, Rob McKenna wrote:
> Nope, you're good.
> 
> Approved
> 
>     -Rob
> 
> On 01/06/17 02:22, Gustavo Romero wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> On 01-06-2017 14:04, Rob McKenna wrote:
>>> Does this patch apply cleanly?
>>
>> Yes, the patch I'm providing here [1] applies cleanly.
>>
>> It differs from the patch in 10 by an indentation issue and hence I requested a
>> new review for [1] in the hotspot-dev [2]. Hence [1] is now reviewed.
>>
>> Please, let me know if any additional step is missing in the approval process.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Gustavo
>>
>> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gromero/8175813/backport/
>> [2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2017-May/027022.html
>>
>>>     -Rob
>>>
>>> On 01/06/17 01:10, Gustavo Romero wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Could the following backport of 8144019 be approved please?
>>>>
>>>> It fixes the JVM NUMA detection on PPC64 when -XX:+UseNUMA is used.
>>>>
>>>> I understand that it's correct to do such a request even if at the moment the
>>>> change is not in 9 as it is already in 10, accordingly to [1].
>>>>
>>>> bug          : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8175813
>>>> webrev       : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gromero/8175813/backport/
>>>> review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2017-May/027022.html
>>>>
>>>> Thank you.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Gustavo
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2017-March/006512.html
>>>>
>>>
>>
>