[8u] Request for Approval for backport of 8175813: PPC64: "mbind: Invalid argument" when -XX:+UseNUMA is used

[David Holmes]

I'll push it for you Gustavo.

Thanks,
David

On 2/06/2017 4:25 AM, Gustavo Romero wrote:
> Thanks, Rob.
> 
> I need a sponsor for that change. Could someone sponsor it please?
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Gustavo
> 
> On 01-06-2017 14:37, Rob McKenna wrote:
>> Nope, you're good.
>>
>> Approved
>>
>>      -Rob
>>
>> On 01/06/17 02:22, Gustavo Romero wrote:
>>> Hi Rob,
>>>
>>> On 01-06-2017 14:04, Rob McKenna wrote:
>>>> Does this patch apply cleanly?
>>>
>>> Yes, the patch I'm providing here [1] applies cleanly.
>>>
>>> It differs from the patch in 10 by an indentation issue and hence I requested a
>>> new review for [1] in the hotspot-dev [2]. Hence [1] is now reviewed.
>>>
>>> Please, let me know if any additional step is missing in the approval process.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Gustavo
>>>
>>> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gromero/8175813/backport/
>>> [2] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2017-May/027022.html
>>>
>>>>      -Rob
>>>>
>>>> On 01/06/17 01:10, Gustavo Romero wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Could the following backport of 8144019 be approved please?
>>>>>
>>>>> It fixes the JVM NUMA detection on PPC64 when -XX:+UseNUMA is used.
>>>>>
>>>>> I understand that it's correct to do such a request even if at the moment the
>>>>> change is not in 9 as it is already in 10, accordingly to [1].
>>>>>
>>>>> bug          : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8175813
>>>>> webrev       : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gromero/8175813/backport/
>>>>> review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2017-May/027022.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Gustavo
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2017-March/006512.html
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>