RFR (S) 8175813: PPC64: "mbind: Invalid argument" when -XX:+UseNUMA is used

David Holmes david.holmes at oracle.com
Wed May 17 22:42:34 UTC 2017


Hi Gustavo,

If this is a request for review because the backport didn't apply 
cleanly then it should be reviewed on the hotspot mailing lists. A link 
to that review thread should be included in the RFA.

If this is intended to be a request for approval then it is in the wrong 
format.

Thanks,
David

On 18/05/2017 8:36 AM, Gustavo Romero wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could the following webrev be reviewed, please?
>
> webrev       : http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gromero/8175813/backport/
> bug          : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8175813
> review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/hotspot-dev/2017-May/026788.html
>
> It's a backport of 8175813, which fixes JVM numa detection on PPC64.
>
> Currently there is no Linux distros that package only libnuma v1, so libnuma api
> v2 (used in that change) is always available.
>
> I understand that it's correct to proceed to request an approval to backport it
> to 8u once reviewed and already in 10 before getting it into 9 [1].
>
> Thank you and best regards,
> Gustavo
>
> [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2017-March/006512.html
>


More information about the jdk8u-dev mailing list