[8u] Request for Approval : Backport of 8171049 : Era.getDisplayName doesn't work with non-IsoChronology
David Buck
david.buck at oracle.com
Fri Nov 9 08:26:03 UTC 2018
HI Deepak,
This looks like a different fix:
> Master Bug Change set: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/8dfed4387312
Cheers,
-Buck
> On Nov 9, 2018, at 13:55, Deepak Kejriwal <deepak.kejriwal at oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Please approve the backport of JDK-8171049 to 8u-dev.
>
>
>
> Master bug : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8171049
>
> Webrev for [8u-dev]: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~rpatil/8171049/webrev.00/
>
> JDK Review Thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/i18n-dev/2018-November/002682.html
>
>
>
>
>
> Master Bug Change set: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/jdk/rev/8dfed4387312
>
> Master Review Thread : http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2017-August/049037.html
>
>
>
> Summary:
>
>
>
> The fix was clean backport but new test file "TestEraDisplayName.java" added as part of fix is modified as per jdk 8 release:-
>
> . All test written in jdk 10 are written to verify the CLDR resource. Since, in case of jdk 8 "CLDR" is not default locale providers, added Djava.locale.providers=CLDR as JVM parameter to test.
>
> . Some resource keys in jdk 8 does not exist in both CLDR and JRE due to which Era.getDisplayName() returns numeric value. Modified such test cases accordingly
>
>
>
> All the related testing is done and is a pass.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Deepak
>
>
More information about the jdk8u-dev
mailing list