[8u-dev] Request for approval for JDK-8208638 : Instead of circle rendered in appl window, but ellipse is produced in JEditorPane
Seán Coffey
sean.coffey at oracle.com
Thu Oct 4 07:59:26 UTC 2018
Approved for jdk8u-dev. Apologies for the delay - I thought I had
approved earlier.
regards,
Sean.
On 04/10/2018 05:13, Krishna Addepalli wrote:
> Hi Sean,
>
> I have updated JDK-8208638 with jdk11u-fix-request label, and also provided the webrev (which is fortunately same as that of 12).
> Could you approve the back port request for 8u?
>
> Thanks,
> Krishna
>
>> On 02-Oct-2018, at 1:59 PM, Seán Coffey <sean.coffey at oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>> I've been monitoring the recent fixes coming into jdk8u-dev. If/when the criteria for allowing fixes into the LTS Update releases is altered, I'll work with the assignees to ensure that applicable 11.0.x fixes are also pushed.
>>
>> regards,
>> Sean.
>>
>>
>> On 01/10/2018 17:29, Philip Race wrote:
>>> I'd go further .. it probably shouldn't go into 8u *without* a concurrent 11u backport.
>>> else (as others have pointed out) when you upgrade from 8u to 11u it regresses
>>> which is against a "big rule".
>>>
>>> -phil.
>>>
>>> On 10/1/18, 2:40 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
>>>> On 28/09/2018 02:11, Krishna Addepalli wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> Could you please approve the backport of the jdk12 fix to 8u-dev?
>>>>> Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8208638
>>>>> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~kaddepalli/8208638/8udev/webrev/
>>>>> The patch is same except for the path difference between jdk12 and jdk8u.
>>>>> JDk12 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk/client/rev/2105d8064ca2
>>>>> JDK12 review thread: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/swing-dev/2018-September/008907.html
>>>>>
>>>> I'm not involved in JDK updates but a back port from JDK 12 to 8u does beg the question as to whether the change will also be backported to 11u. I see there is discussion on jdk-updates-dev about the approvals for 11u but in the mean time then maybe backport issues should be created to at least track what will otherwise be regressions moving from 8u to 11u.
>>>>
>>>> -Alan
More information about the jdk8u-dev
mailing list