Fix version tags in JBS for jdk8u

Andrew Hughes gnu.andrew at redhat.com
Fri Feb 15 16:33:16 UTC 2019


On Fri, 15 Feb 2019 at 15:44, Langer, Christoph
<christoph.langer at sap.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Aleksey,
>
> > I think openjdk8u is the tag that is set for jdk8u/jdk8u-dev -- IIRC, it was this
> > way before as
> > well. I expect proper tags to appear after jdk8u/jdk8u-dev -> jdk8u/jdk8u
> > merge.
>
> Look at this guy [1]. This illustrates the process it had been so far quite good.
>
> I pushed the change to jdk8u-dev when it was open for 8u192. So it fixed version "8u192". Then Oracle internally brought the fix to several other versions, e.g. 8u191. Andrew also brought the change to OpenJDK 7 - but there it only got the "openjdk7u" version tag. I guess that's what it would be for openjdk8u from now on as well - no "proper tags" if we don't take action.
>
> Best regards
> Christoph
>
> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8197943
>

Indeed, I'm still not happy with the 7u situation. It seems that doing something
better means contacting the ops team at Oracle to get them to add more versions
and fix their hgupdater [0].

I would make most sense to me that they created an openjdk8ux version when
they created jdk8ux, but I don't know if that's possible.

Similar for 11u, I imagine.

[0] https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk7u-dev/2015-July/010333.html
-- 
Andrew :)

Senior Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

Web Site: http://fuseyism.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/gnu_andrew_java
PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222


More information about the jdk8u-dev mailing list