[8u, 11u] Wiki Page updates

[Andrew John Hughes]

On 13/03/2019 07:58, Langer, Christoph wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
>> As I said yesterday [0], I think we need a label for fixes that are in
>> 8u-dev but are candidates for the current 8u after the initial
>> integration. Leaving this to bug comments makes them hard for us to find.
>>
>> I suggest 8u-CPU-critical-request and 11u-CPU-critical-request as
>> previously used [1].
> 
> I think it sounds reasonable. We can use jdk8u-critical-request and jdk11u-critical-request, since we are not planning to ship CPUs in OpenJDK. This will avoid namespace collisions with Oracle.
> 
> I also think this should not only apply for changes that are already in jdk8u-dev/jdk11u-dev and shall be brought to jdk8u/jdk11u but also for direct pushes into jdk8u/jdk11u.
> 
> What do other people think, especially aph? If we agree on it, I'll update this part in the wiki and we can start living up to it.
> 

That sounds fine to me. Presumably, these would be paired with
jdk8u-critical-approved and jdk11u-critical-approved.

Thanks,
-- 
Andrew :)

Senior Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222
https://keybase.io/gnu_andrew