[8u-dev] RFR+RFA (M): JDK-8176100: [REDO][REDO] G1 Needs pre barrier on dereference of weak JNI handles

[Andrey Petushkov]

Hi Paul, All,

hotspot/test/runtime tests for the build with the patch have passed on
e6500-based machine

Regards,
Andrey

On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 12:36 AM Hohensee, Paul <hohensee at amazon.com> wrote:

> Thank you, Dmitry. Now we just need ppc results.
>
> Paul
>
> On 4/29/19, 11:59 PM, "jdk8u-dev on behalf of Dmitry Cherepanov" <
> jdk8u-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net on behalf of dcherepanov at azul.com>
> wrote:
>
>     Hi Paul, Andrew,
>
>     I tested this with Solaris builds (x86_64 and sparc) and the results
> look good. The build passed and running jtreg’s tests
> (hotspot/test/runtime) didn’t reveal any regression.
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Dmitry
>
>     > On Apr 24, 2019, at 7:38 AM, Andrew John Hughes <
> gnu.andrew at redhat.com> wrote:
>     >
>     > On 23/04/2019 19:15, Hohensee, Paul wrote:
>     >> Ping. And, may I have a jdk8u-fix-yes tag?
>     >>
>     >> On 4/11/19, 2:38 PM, "jdk8u-dev on behalf of Hohensee, Paul" <
> jdk8u-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net on behalf of hohensee at amazon.com>
> wrote:
>     >>
>     >>    Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8176100
>     >>    Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~phh/8176100/webrev.8u.01/
>     >>
>     >>    Original patch:
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/hotspot/rev/b163435e40b3
>     >>
>     >>    Patch applies cleanly net of file names and line numbers, except
> that shell scripts are necessary for jdk8 to run the two new tests. Also, I
> don’t have facilities to test x86 32-bit, sparc or ppc, so I’d greatly
> appreciate someone trying it on those platforms.
>     >>
>     >>    Thanks,
>     >>
>     >>    Paul
>     >>
>     >>
>     >>
>     >
>     > I saw the original post, but I'm waiting on the review outcome before
>     > approving a patch of this size with arch-specific changes.
>     >
>     > I'd also like to see some response with regards x86 & ppc. I think
> sparc
>     > may lack support, going forward, and I don't think Oracle were even
>     > particularly maintaining Linux+SPARC. Last time I asked around, I
>     > couldn't find anyone with a machine to test it on. It looks like
> there
>     > may be some in the GCC compile farm now [0], so I'll try and take a
>     > look, unless anyone has any better offers.
>     >
>     > [0] https://cfarm.tetaneutral.net/machines/list/
>     > --
>     > Andrew :)
>     >
>     > Senior Free Java Software Engineer
>     > Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)
>     >
>     > PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
>     > Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222
>     > https://keybase.io/gnu_andrew
>
>
>
>