[8u] RFR 8073108: Use x86 and SPARC CPU instructions for GHASH acceleration

Hohensee, Paul hohensee at amazon.com
Fri Nov 22 17:31:30 UTC 2019


Thanks, Martin. Looking forward to the result.

On 11/22/19, 8:16 AM, "Doerr, Martin" <martin.doerr at sap.com> wrote:

    Hi Paul,
    
    I've put the patches into our nightly tests. Jdk8u tests are supposed to run over the weekend.
    I'll check if I can get a result from SPARC on Monday morning.
    
    Best regards,
    Martin
    
    
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: jdk8u-dev <jdk8u-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net> On Behalf Of
    > Hohensee, Paul
    > Sent: Freitag, 22. November 2019 17:07
    > To: Martin Balao <mbalao at redhat.com>; jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net
    > Subject: [DMARC FAILURE] Re: [8u] RFR 8073108: Use x86 and SPARC CPU
    > instructions for GHASH acceleration
    > 
    > I'm fine with your proposal to go ahead with 8073108 and do 8130341 next.
    > Now we just need sparc verification. If we don't get that in the next day or
    > two, then I'm ok with pushing just x32/64. Sparc can be done later.
    > 
    > Thanks,
    > Paul
    > 
    > On 11/21/19, 9:04 PM, "Martin Balao" <mbalao at redhat.com> wrote:
    > 
    >     Hi Paul,
    > 
    >     On 11/21/19 12:48 PM, Hohensee, Paul wrote:
    >     > You should be able to build a 32-bit linux jdk and test it on x32.
    > 
    >     The following tests are passing in x86 32 bits (Linux):
    > 
    >      * jdk/test/com/sun/crypto/provider/Cipher/AES/TestGHASH.java
    > 
    >     The following tests are failing in x86 32 bits (Linux):
    > 
    >      * hotspot/test/compiler/7184394/TestAESMain.java
    > 
    >     The reason why TestAESMain fails is that there is a known bug fixed by
    >     8130341 [1]. I've applied my 8u backport of 8130341 [1] and can confirm
    >     that the test passes. So I suggest not to block the 8u backport of
    >     8073108 and proceed with a 8u backport of 8130341 thereafter.
    > 
    >     Note: a 8u backport of 8130341 has been proposed by Yuri Gaevsky here:
    >     http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2019-
    > October/010437.html This
    >     backport is identical to mine (except for the commit headers which were
    >     not included in Yuri's patch).
    > 
    >     Thanks,
    >     Martin.-
    > 
    >     --
    >     [1] - https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8130341
    > 
    > 
    
    



More information about the jdk8u-dev mailing list