[8u] RFR 8073108: Use x86 and SPARC CPU instructions for GHASH acceleration

[Doerr, Martin]

Tests on SPARC were successful. No issues found.

Best regards,
Martin


> -----Original Message-----
> From: jdk8u-dev <jdk8u-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net> On Behalf Of
> Doerr, Martin
> Sent: Freitag, 22. November 2019 17:15
> To: Hohensee, Paul <hohensee at amazon.com>; Martin Balao
> <mbalao at redhat.com>; jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net
> Subject: [CAUTION] RE: [8u] RFR 8073108: Use x86 and SPARC CPU
> instructions for GHASH acceleration
> 
> Hi Paul,
> 
> I've put the patches into our nightly tests. Jdk8u tests are supposed to run
> over the weekend.
> I'll check if I can get a result from SPARC on Monday morning.
> 
> Best regards,
> Martin
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: jdk8u-dev <jdk8u-dev-bounces at openjdk.java.net> On Behalf Of
> > Hohensee, Paul
> > Sent: Freitag, 22. November 2019 17:07
> > To: Martin Balao <mbalao at redhat.com>; jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net
> > Subject: [DMARC FAILURE] Re: [8u] RFR 8073108: Use x86 and SPARC CPU
> > instructions for GHASH acceleration
> >
> > I'm fine with your proposal to go ahead with 8073108 and do 8130341 next.
> > Now we just need sparc verification. If we don't get that in the next day or
> > two, then I'm ok with pushing just x32/64. Sparc can be done later.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Paul
> >
> > On 11/21/19, 9:04 PM, "Martin Balao" <mbalao at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi Paul,
> >
> >     On 11/21/19 12:48 PM, Hohensee, Paul wrote:
> >     > You should be able to build a 32-bit linux jdk and test it on x32.
> >
> >     The following tests are passing in x86 32 bits (Linux):
> >
> >      * jdk/test/com/sun/crypto/provider/Cipher/AES/TestGHASH.java
> >
> >     The following tests are failing in x86 32 bits (Linux):
> >
> >      * hotspot/test/compiler/7184394/TestAESMain.java
> >
> >     The reason why TestAESMain fails is that there is a known bug fixed by
> >     8130341 [1]. I've applied my 8u backport of 8130341 [1] and can confirm
> >     that the test passes. So I suggest not to block the 8u backport of
> >     8073108 and proceed with a 8u backport of 8130341 thereafter.
> >
> >     Note: a 8u backport of 8130341 has been proposed by Yuri Gaevsky here:
> >     http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk8u-dev/2019-
> > October/010437.html This
> >     backport is identical to mine (except for the commit headers which were
> >     not included in Yuri's patch).
> >
> >     Thanks,
> >     Martin.-
> >
> >     --
> >     [1] - https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8130341
> >
> >