[8u] RFR: 8249677: Regression after JDK-8237117: Better ForkJoinPool behavior
Anton Kozlov
akozlov at azul.com
Mon Jul 20 08:37:12 UTC 2020
On 20.07.2020 08:40, Chris Hegarty wrote:
> A solution that reverts the change to the protected constructor, and adds a package-private constructor that does the necessary ACC restricting, in a similar way to that of the code in 11u, would appear most appropriate here.
Thank you for the comment, I've prepared a fix that follows this way:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~akozlov/8249677/webrev.00/
The change also brings consistency with observable jdk11u logic. The test case from lucene-solr passes after applying this, as well as Test.java supplied to the bug.
Could you please review the change?
Thanks,
Anton
More information about the jdk8u-dev
mailing list