[8u] RFR: 8249677: Regression after JDK-8237117: Better ForkJoinPool behavior

[Severin Gehwolf]

Hi Anton,

On Mon, 2020-07-20 at 11:37 +0300, Anton Kozlov wrote:
> On 20.07.2020 08:40, Chris Hegarty wrote:
> > A solution that reverts the change to the protected constructor,
> > and adds a package-private constructor that does the necessary ACC
> > restricting, in a similar way to that of the code in 11u, would
> > appear most appropriate here.
> 
> Thank you for the comment, I've prepared a fix that follows this way:
> 
>   http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~akozlov/8249677/webrev.00/
> 
> The change also brings consistency with observable jdk11u logic. The
> test case from lucene-solr passes after applying this, as well as
> Test.java supplied to the bug.

Couldn't we include a regression test with the fix based on Test.java
Like so:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8249677/jdk8/01/webrev/

Thanks,
Severin