[8u] RFR: 8249677: Regression after JDK-8237117: Better ForkJoinPool behavior
Martin Balao
mbalao at redhat.com
Fri Jul 24 16:31:14 UTC 2020
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 1:18 PM Andrew Hughes <gnu.andrew at redhat.com> wrote:
> I discussed this with Martin yesterday evening. I'd prefer we went with
> webrev.03 and then separately inverted the test to make it absolutely
> clear that, at present, the new behaviour is the expected behaviour.
>
The inverted test sounds like a good idea to me, so we enforce the
expected behavior -whatever the expected behavior is-. I'd have gone
with Webrev.04 and include the inverted test in a separated commit.
Anyways, it's too late for that.
More information about the jdk8u-dev
mailing list