[8u] RFR: 8249677: Regression after JDK-8237117: Better ForkJoinPool behavior

[Andrew Hughes]

On 24/07/2020 17:31, Martin Balao wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 1:18 PM Andrew Hughes <gnu.andrew at redhat.com> wrote:
>> I discussed this with Martin yesterday evening. I'd prefer we went with
>> webrev.03 and then separately inverted the test to make it absolutely
>> clear that, at present, the new behaviour is the expected behaviour.
>>
> 
> The inverted test sounds like a good idea to me, so we enforce the
> expected behavior -whatever the expected behavior is-. I'd have gone
> with Webrev.04 and include the inverted test in a separated commit.
> Anyways, it's too late for that.
> 

I wanted to get the test itself under Anton's authorship, not mine.

I'm not sure it matters greatly that the test fails for one revision :)

Thanks,
-- 
Andrew :)

Senior Free Java Software Engineer
OpenJDK Package Owner
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

PGP Key: ed25519/0xCFDA0F9B35964222 (hkp://keys.gnupg.net)
Fingerprint = 5132 579D D154 0ED2 3E04  C5A0 CFDA 0F9B 3596 4222