Tracking dependencies between backport bugs

[Andrew Haley]

On 1/6/21 11:25 AM, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> I personally think that
> JDK-8078614 looks suitable for backporting to 8u, although it might fail
> on the criteria (it's not an Oracle parity patch I don't think?)
Maybe just backport 8078614. You've already spent more time
thinking about it than just fixing the bug.

Or maybe just add a comment to 8078614?

-- 
Andrew Haley  (he/him)
Java Platform Lead Engineer
Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>
https://keybase.io/andrewhaley
EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671