[External] : RE: [8u] RFR: JDK-8261867: Backport relevant test changes & additions from JDK-8130125

Sergey Bylokhov Sergey.Bylokhov at oracle.com
Sat Mar 27 05:11:02 UTC 2021


On 26.03.2021 21:54, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
> On 25.03.2021 13:36, Hohensee, Paul wrote:
>> Point to the JBS issues for the fix please?
> 
> At least these:
> JDK-8056911, JDK-8076178

But it will cause the bugs in the realSync to be visible through the public API(Robot#waitForIdle)
So it is up2to the 8u maintainers to decide what to do.

> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Paul
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sergey Bylokhov <Sergey.Bylokhov at oracle.com>
>> Date: Wednesday, March 24, 2021 at 5:23 PM
>> To: Andrew Hughes <gnu.andrew at redhat.com>, "Hohensee, Paul" <hohensee at amazon.com>
>> Cc: "jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net" <jdk8u-dev at openjdk.java.net>
>> Subject: RE: [8u] RFR: JDK-8261867: Backport relevant test changes & additions from JDK-8130125
>>
>> On 23.03.2021 23:42, Andrew Hughes wrote:
>>> Yes, for some reason, I think I was under the delusion it was JDK code, not test code.
>>> As is, it's cleanup that was done for the modules system, but is applicable even before that.
>>>
>>> I'm happy for your version to go in if you want to flag it with jdk8u-fix-request.
>>
>> Just heads up, I see that a variety of tests updated to use the waitForIdle instead
>> of realsync, are you sure the fix for Robot.waitForIdle() was backported? In jdk 8u
>> the Robot.waitForIdle() was broken and this is why the realsync was used for testing.
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Best regards, Sergey.
>>
> 
> 


-- 
Best regards, Sergey.


More information about the jdk8u-dev mailing list