updates to JEP 277 - Enhanced Deprecation
Martijn Verburg
martijnverburg at gmail.com
Tue Aug 2 20:44:00 UTC 2016
Hi Stuart,
Looks good although the whimsical part of me will miss 'condemned'
somewhat! Very, very happy to see @Deprecation already being applied to
some unsafe internal APIs, with tooling support I think we can all look
forward to educating developers that having things like Thread.stop removed
forever, is a very good thing (tm).
If the dynamic deprecation feature arrives in a Java 1.9.x update I think
that will be a nice bonus, but static code analysis will go a long way
nonetheless.
Cheers,
Martijn
On 27 July 2016 at 06:59, Stuart Marks <stuart.marks at oracle.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've done a major update to the text of JEP 277.[1] Most of this is to
> reflect the reality of what's happening in JDK 9, and some of it is tying
> off of loose ends.
>
> The most significant change is around the treatment of warning messages
> mandated by the JLS (9.6.4.6). Currently, deprecation warnings can be
> suppressed with @SuppressWarnings("deprecation"). Currently, this
> suppresses warnings even if the API is deprecated with forRemoval=true.
> This is a problem, since the removal warning might be missed, leading to
> unexpected compile-time or run-time errors when the API is actually removed.
>
> The proposal is to have uses of APIs deprecated for removal generate
> warnings anyway, even within code that as @SuppressWarnings("deprecation").
>
> These new "deprecation for removal" warnings can in turn be suppressed
> using a different warnings suppression string,
>
> @SuppressWarnings("dep-removal")
>
> The idea is that you get a warning for use of a for-removal deprecated
> API, even if you've previously suppressed the warning. Essentially you have
> to suppress it again if you want to continue using the API warning-free.
> This is somewhat intrusive, but I think it's warranted, given the gravity
> of the for-removal deprecation.
>
> Highlights of other changes to the JEP include:
>
> * update terminology from "condemned" to "forRemoval"
>
> * new material on policy for usage of @Deprecated in Java SE, particularly
> with regarding to forRemoval=true
>
> * updated list of deprecation candidates, with specific references to APIs
> being deprecated in Java SE 9
>
> * removal of dynamic deprecation detection usage tool from JDK 9, for lack
> of time :-(
>
> * new material describing issues with warning messages
>
> s'marks
>
>
> [1] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8065614
>
More information about the jdk9-dev
mailing list