Use-cases for version ranges?
cowwoc
cowwoc at bbs.darktech.org
Mon Nov 21 13:04:20 PST 2011
I get the feeling that someone doesn't care about readability or
usability ;) Computers should be working hard to make humans happy, not
the other way around.
Gili
On 21/11/2011 3:37 PM, Tim Diekmann [via jigsaw-dev] wrote:
> > The naming convention is version based. It looks like:
> >
> > interface Collections {}
> > interface Collections_1_2 extends Collections {}
> > interface Collections_1_2_1 extends Collections_1_2 {}
> > interface Collections_1_3 extends Collections_1_2_1 {}
> >
> > We attempted this at Orbitz and it was not pretty in practice.
>
> But did it work or cause other problems?
>
> Tim.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the
> discussion below:
> http://jigsaw-dev.1059479.n5.nabble.com/Use-cases-for-version-ranges-tp5002801p5011613.html
>
> To unsubscribe from Use-cases for version ranges?, click here
> <http://jigsaw-dev.1059479.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=5002801&code=Y293d29jQGJicy5kYXJrdGVjaC5vcmd8NTAwMjgwMXwxNTc0MzIxMjQ3>.
> NAML
> <http://jigsaw-dev.1059479.n5.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.InstantMailNamespace&breadcrumbs=instant+emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>
--
View this message in context: http://jigsaw-dev.1059479.n5.nabble.com/Use-cases-for-version-ranges-tp5002801p5011690.html
Sent from the jigsaw-dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the jigsaw-dev
mailing list