Heads up, BDB coming, needed to support fast configuration

[David Holmes]

On 11/05/2012 11:49 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
> On 11/05/2012 14:11, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> Instead of synchronizing the method on the signature the synchronization
>> should be done internally. That will give more flexibility in the
>> future if the
>> internal data structure or interface changes without needing to change
>> the method signature.
> AFAIK, this isn't considered part of the method signature and so
> wouldn't be an API change.

Correct. "synchronized" on a method is an implementation detail not part 
of the signature - it can be changed at will.

David
-----

> -Alan.