RFR 8158736: Adapter class loaders can avoid creating named dynamic modules

Jochen Theodorou blackdrag at gmx.org
Mon Jun 6 19:00:41 UTC 2016


On 06.06.2016 11:38, Sundararajan Athijegannathan wrote:
[...]
> There is no need for named dynamic module - as there is nothing to
> encapsulate.  Nashorn module can still selectively export packages to
> adapter module [ so that generated adapter class can access nashorn
> internals as needed].

does that mean the only user of named dynamic modules is gone now?

bye Jochen



More information about the jigsaw-dev mailing list