RFR 8158736: Adapter class loaders can avoid creating named dynamic modules
Jochen Theodorou
blackdrag at gmx.org
Mon Jun 6 19:00:41 UTC 2016
On 06.06.2016 11:38, Sundararajan Athijegannathan wrote:
[...]
> There is no need for named dynamic module - as there is nothing to
> encapsulate. Nashorn module can still selectively export packages to
> adapter module [ so that generated adapter class can access nashorn
> internals as needed].
does that mean the only user of named dynamic modules is gone now?
bye Jochen
More information about the jigsaw-dev
mailing list