RFR(L) : 8176176 : fix @modules in jdk_svc tests

Alexandre (Shura) Iline alexandre.iline at oracle.com
Fri Mar 10 01:02:00 UTC 2017


Igor,

I have reviewed some number tests which change the @modules - they are fine. 

You, however, fix more things with this than missing module dependency declaration. There is a redesign of line-number-sensitive tests [1] and other multiple improvements such as in [2]. Would it be more convenient to have that as separate bugs?

Shura

[1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev/8176176/webrev.00/test/com/sun/jdi/ArgumentValuesTest.java.sdiff.html
[2] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev/8176176/webrev.00/test/com/sun/jdi/ArrayLengthDumpTest.sh.sdiff.html

> On Mar 7, 2017, at 1:07 PM, Igor Ignatyev <igor.ignatyev at oracle.com> wrote:
> 
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev/8176176/webrev.00/index.html
>> 2586 lines changed: 669 ins; 484 del; 1433 mod;
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> Could you please review this changeset which fix @modules dependency declaration in jdk_svc tests?
> there are a couple issues w/ modules in jdk_svc tests: 
> - some tests do not specify modules which they depend on 
> - modules in TEST.properties is not used in cases there all tests (should) have the same @modules directive 
> - @modules directive isn't placed according to current convention (before the 1st run directive)
> 
> Since this fix has already touched lots of tests, I have decided to use this opportunity and reordered some of jtreg tags as well, so there won’t be two massive updates in the tests.
> 
> Some of our tests are line number sensitive, and then I fixed jtreg declaration, they started to fail. It was really hard to find our all line number sensitive tests, so I have unified the way we declare that as a part of this fix. Please let me know if you prefer to have it done separately.
> 
> There are two one-liners which, I hope, can simplify review:
> [1] shows only the changes which are not in comments. Besides obvious new added TEST.properties, there are changes in the following line number sensitive tests (which I mentioned before):
> test/com/sun/jdi/ArgumentValuesTest.java
> test/com/sun/jdi/BreakpointTest.java  
> test/com/sun/jdi/FetchLocals.java
> test/com/sun/jdi/GetLocalVariables.java
> test/com/sun/jdi/GetSetLocalTest.java 
> test/com/sun/jdi/LambdaBreakpointTest.java 
> test/com/sun/jdi/LineNumberOnBraceTest.java 
> test/com/sun/jdi/PopAndStepTest.java
> 
> [2] shows changes in jtreg tags, it can help to see that almost all changes in jtreg tags are either moving of tags which does not affect execution order or @modules changes.
> 
> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev/8176176/webrev.00/index.html
> bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8176176
> Testing: 
> - jdk_svc on linux, windows, mac
> - checked that all tests which could be executed with full jdk before still can be executed with full jdk
> 
> Thanks,
> — Igor
> 
> [1] $ hg diff -w | grep "^[+-]" | grep -v "^[+-]\s*[*#]"
> [2] $ hg diff -w | grep -e "^\(+++ b\)\|\(--- a\)" -e "^[+-]\s*[*#]\s*@"



More information about the jigsaw-dev mailing list