RFR: 7417: Fix incorrect identifier in result for biased locking revocation rule [v2]

mohno007 duke at openjdk.java.net
Fri Jan 21 15:04:18 UTC 2022


On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 12:11:00 GMT, Marcus Hirt <hirt at openjdk.org> wrote:

>> mohno007 has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains two commits:
>> 
>>  - Update copyright year
>>  - Fix wrong placeholder in BiasedLockingRevocationRule
>
> core/org.openjdk.jmc.flightrecorder.rules.jdk/src/main/java/org/openjdk/jmc/flightrecorder/rules/jdk/latency/BiasedLockingRevocationRule.java line 115:
> 
>> 113: 	private static final List<TypedPreference<?>> CONFIG_ATTRIBUTES = Arrays.<TypedPreference<?>> asList(WARNING_LIMIT,
>> 114: 			MAX_NUMBER_OF_CLASSES_TO_REPORT, FILTERED_CLASSES);
>> 115: 
> 
> Need to update copyright year.

Thank you for your advice. I fixed it in ecb74c7.

> core/org.openjdk.jmc.flightrecorder.rules.jdk/src/main/resources/org/openjdk/jmc/flightrecorder/rules/jdk/messages/internal/messages.properties line 77:
> 
>> 75: BiasedLockingRevocationRule_TEXT_OK=No classes were disabled from participating in biased locking
>> 76: BiasedLockingRevocationRule_TEXT_REVOKED_CLASSES_FOUND=Fully revoked classes found.
>> 77: BiasedLockingRevocationRule_TEXT_REVOKED_CLASSES_FOUND_LONG=The following classes were disabled from using biased locking: {revokedClasses}
> 
> Need to update copyright year.

Thank you for your advice. I fixed it in ecb74c7.

-------------

PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jmc/pull/309


More information about the jmc-dev mailing list