Comparing performance of JDK List Implementations

[Henri Tremblay]

No. It worked this time.

Lists.java

On 22 October 2016 at 11:30, Bruce Eckel <bruceteckel at gmail.com> wrote:

> Trying again -- I see it as attached in the original message; does this
> list filter out attachments?
>
>
>
>
> -- Bruce Eckel
> www.MindviewInc.com <http://www.mindviewinc.com/>
> Blog: BruceEckel.github.io
> www.WinterTechForum.com
> www.AtomicScala.com
> www.Reinventing-Business.com
> http://www.TrustOrganizations.com <http://www.ScalaSummit.com>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 7:27 AM, kirk.pepperdine at gmail.com <
> kirk.pepperdine at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Bruce,
> >
> > Sorry, don’t see the attachment.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Kirk
> >
> > > On Oct 21, 2016, at 10:16 PM, Bruce Eckel <bruceteckel at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Attached is my current version which compares List implementations. I
> > plan
> > > to do this for the other basic collection types (Set, Map, Queue,
> > Dequeue),
> > > but would like some feedback on this one. Thanks.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -- Bruce Eckel
> > > www.MindviewInc.com <http://www.mindviewinc.com/>
> > > Blog: BruceEckel.github.io
> > > www.WinterTechForum.com
> > > www.AtomicScala.com
> > > www.Reinventing-Business.com
> > > http://www.TrustOrganizations.com <http://www.ScalaSummit.com>
> >
> >
>