Comparing performance of JDK List Implementations

kirk.pepperdine at gmail.com kirk.pepperdine at gmail.com
Mon Oct 24 06:41:15 UTC 2016


Hi Bruce,

It must as I still don’t see any attachments. Maybe you have the code in GitHub?

— Kirk

> On Oct 22, 2016, at 4:30 PM, Bruce Eckel <bruceteckel at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Trying again -- I see it as attached in the original message; does this
> list filter out attachments?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- Bruce Eckel
> www.MindviewInc.com <http://www.mindviewinc.com/>
> Blog: BruceEckel.github.io
> www.WinterTechForum.com
> www.AtomicScala.com
> www.Reinventing-Business.com
> http://www.TrustOrganizations.com <http://www.ScalaSummit.com>
> 
> 
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 7:27 AM, kirk.pepperdine at gmail.com <
> kirk.pepperdine at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Bruce,
>> 
>> Sorry, don’t see the attachment.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Kirk
>> 
>>> On Oct 21, 2016, at 10:16 PM, Bruce Eckel <bruceteckel at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Attached is my current version which compares List implementations. I
>> plan
>>> to do this for the other basic collection types (Set, Map, Queue,
>> Dequeue),
>>> but would like some feedback on this one. Thanks.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- Bruce Eckel
>>> www.MindviewInc.com <http://www.mindviewinc.com/>
>>> Blog: BruceEckel.github.io
>>> www.WinterTechForum.com
>>> www.AtomicScala.com
>>> www.Reinventing-Business.com
>>> http://www.TrustOrganizations.com <http://www.ScalaSummit.com>
>> 
>> 



More information about the jmh-dev mailing list