jmx-dev Review request: 8049303: Transient network problems cause JMX thread to fail silenty
Daniel Fuchs
daniel.fuchs at oracle.com
Thu Sep 11 14:04:30 UTC 2014
Hi Shanliang,
If there's still time - you might want to add the following
comment too:
1353 try {
// The server may have closed the
// connection, expecting us to reconnect.
// The communicatorAdmin will handle
// this case.
1354 communicatorAdmin.gotIOException(ioe);
1355 // reconnection OK, back to "while" to do again
No need to generate a new webrev!
best,
-- daniel
On 9/11/14 3:58 PM, shanliang wrote:
> Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 09/11/2014 12:31 PM, Daniel Fuchs wrote:
>>> On 9/10/14 9:45 PM, shanliang wrote:
>>>> Oh, not one retry attempt fetching the next batch of notifications, but
>>>> the *SAME* batch of notifications.
>>>>
>>>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sjiang/JDK-8049303/02/
>>>> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Esjiang/JDK-8049303/02/>
>>>>
>>>> Shanliang
>>>>>
>>>
>>> This looks good Shanliang!
>>>
>>
>> I have just one nit - rename "throwsDeserializationException()" to
>> "rethrowDeserializationException()" - it makes its purpose clear.
> I have already added internal comments to explain the call, but why not.
>>
>> Otherwise - Thumbs Up!
> Thanks for review!
>
> Shanliang
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> -JB-
>>> Make sure to rerun all the JCK/JDK tests before pushing.
>>> This was really a tricky problem!
>>>
>>> best regards,
>>>
>>> -- daniel
>>
>
More information about the jmx-dev
mailing list