Meeting to reach a conclusion (resend)

Martijn Verburg martijnverburg at gmail.com
Wed May 10 21:31:49 UTC 2017


I'm not an EG member - but happy to facilitate.  The LJC is also planning a
hack day this Saturday to try out some of the latest ideas.

Cheers
Martijn

On Wed, 10 May 2017 at 21:05, David M. Lloyd <david.lloyd at redhat.com> wrote:

> I'm open to this idea.  I would like to continue to publish proposals on
> this list until such a meeting can take place though.  It might serve as
> a good foundation for discussion at the very least.
>
> Some of the EG might be at DevoxxUK tomorrow and/or Wednesday (I'm not,
> but other Red Hat folks are/will be).  That might be a good
> (preliminary?) opportunity to meet face to face, at least for some
> subset of the EG.
>
> On 05/10/2017 02:43 PM, Tim Ellison wrote:
> > I don't see my first attempt to send this email in the list archive, so
> re-sending...
> >
> >
> >     me --- Meeting to reach a conclusion ---
> >      From:"Tim Ellison" <Tim_Ellison at uk.ibm.com
> >To:jpms-spec-experts at openjdk.java.netDate:Wed, 10 May 2017
> 15:54Subject:Meeting to reach a conclusion
> >
> >
> >       I'm mindful that the clock is now running under the JCP process
> [1] for us to submit a revised specification for reconsideration.
> >
> >
> >
> >       Mark has said there is no business pressure to hit the JDK9
> schedule dates, however, we should aim to square away remaining issues as
> quickly as possible and submit a reconsideration.  We don't have to use the
> full 30-days afforded, and should work to ensure the spec delivery stays on
> track.
> >
> >
> >
> >       I think it would be useful to increase the bandwidth of EG
> communication during this period.  The mailing list conversation to date
> has been "bursty", and at times open to misinterpretation.  So I propose we
> try and find some time within the next two weeks where the EG can gather
> around a whiteboard and talk.  Ideally this would be face-to-face if we can
> find a suitable time and place, because I think we'd make much more
> progress in one or two days of focused conversation.  If not a physical
> meeting we can fall back to conference call, video call, etc.
> >
> >
> >
> >       Of course, all decisions and conclusions in such a meeting would
> be brought back to this mailing list for openness and posterity, with a
> suitable period for observers to comment before re-submission.
> >
> >
> >
> >       Are people open to such a suggestion?
> >
> >
> >
> >       [1] https://www.jcp.org/en/procedures/jcp2#3.4.5
> >
> >
> >
> >       Regards,
> >
> >       TimUnless stated otherwise above:
> > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
> 3AU
> >
>
>
> --
> - DML
>
-- 
Cheers, Martijn (Sent from Gmail Mobile)


More information about the jpms-spec-observers mailing list