JTRegs for OpenJDK

[Mani Sarkar]

That's a great start, I find the idea interesting.

+1 nested logs, clicking, etc
On 21 Jun 2012 19:24, "Jonathan Gibbons" <jonathan.gibbons at oracle.com>
wrote:

> **
> In a previous job, I wrote a script to convert a make log into series of
> HTML files, such that recursive makes were detected, so that if one make
> file invoked another, the output from the child make was moved to separate
> file and then replaced in the parent log by a link. The result is a tree of
> Makefiles that you can easily browse through.   It's easy to add in
> additional features to compress long command lines that expand when you
> click on them, etc.  Was it useful back then: yes, very.  Would it be
> useful now?  Maybe not so much, especially with the new makefiles coming
> online.
>
> -- Jon
>
>
>
> On 06/21/2012 10:11 AM, Mani Sarkar wrote:
>
> Thanks Kelly for the response, I do understand its not a top prio
> requirement.
>
> Maybe I might be a able to help you out there with some utility program .
> ;) don't want to make any promises but when I get around it ill post a.copy
> of the program to the list.
>
> Cheers,
> Mani
> On 21 Jun 2012 17:51, "Kelly O'Hair" <kelly.ohair at oracle.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>  These messages are just echos of the commands being run, if you have a
>> suggested change to make them
>> somehow more readable, I'm sure we would consider it.  But it's not a
>> high item on my priority list. Sorry.
>>
>>  When some of this original makefile logic was written, jtreg was pretty
>> basic, and it has changed since then,
>> such that we might be able to simplify some of this makefile shell logic.
>>
>>  -kto
>>
>>  On Jun 21, 2012, at 2:16 AM, Mani Sarkar wrote:
>>
>>  Thanks ill take a look at it.
>>
>> I do have a suggestion though if there could be tabs, spaces and some
>> sort of indentation added to the messages and logs the makes and scripts
>> display. I love the fact that they are so verbose just a bit of tweak will
>> help us able to read these msgs easily .
>>
>> Thanks again.
>>
>> Mani
>> On 21 Jun 2012 09:56, "Weijun Wang" <weijun.wang at oracle.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Mani
>>>
>>> Welcome to the OpenJDK!
>>>
>>> On 06/21/2012 02:31 PM, Mani Sarkar wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> I have been configuring and testing the JTRegs with OpenJDK on Ubuntu
>>>> 12.04 and attached are couple of log files with errors.
>>>>
>>>> Can someone help me out understand where the config for the JTRegs is
>>>> going wrong, or is it a different problem altogether.
>>>>
>>>> One of them mentions win32 in the log, while I'm using linux. I have
>>>> attached .sh file that updates the environment along with this message.
>>>>
>>>
>>> test1.log has
>>>
>>>  -jdk:/home/openjdk/sources/jdk8_tl/jdk/test/../build/linux-amd64
>>>
>>> so it's using the build inside jdk8_tl/jdk. I guess you directly call
>>> make in jdk8_tl and your build is also there. I read the Makefile a little
>>> and seems you can try again your test with
>>>
>>>   make ALT_OUTPUTDIR=/home/openjdk/sources/jdk8_tl/build/linux-amd64
>>> jdk_util
>>>
>>> Please do not set the ALT_OUTPUTDIR variable permanent as it might
>>> interfere with your build.
>>>
>>> *Kelly*: Is it true that launching a test from the top directory cannot
>>> use the control build?
>>>
>>> As for test2.log, it shows JT_HOME=/home/openjdk/jtreg/linux/bin. It
>>> should be only /home/openjdk/jtreg.
>>>
>>> It's OK to see a win32, those scripts are essentially the same across
>>> platforms.
>>>
>>> Good luck!
>>>
>>> -Max
>>>
>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Mani
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jtreg-use/attachments/20120621/a8c291ef/attachment.html