Kulla binaries: missing native library

Robert Field robert.field at oracle.com
Thu Jul 23 09:07:43 UTC 2015


There are dependencies on changes I made in the accessibility of javac 
functionality that occurred in JDK9

Robert



On July 23, 2015 1:54:40 AM Andrei Eremeev <andrei.eremeev at oracle.com> wrote:

> It must be true. If you try to run Kulla with JDK older than 9, you will
> get a error "run with JDK9...".
>
> Andrei
>
> On 23.07.2015 11:50, Eugene Zhuravlev wrote:
> > Thanks a lot Jan,
> > It works fine with b73.
> >
> > Am I right that Kulla won't run with older JDK versions (e.g. java 8)?
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Eugene Zhuravlev
> > Software Developer
> > JetBrains
> > http://www.jetbrains.com
> > "Develop with pleasure!"
> >
> > On 22-Jul-15 10:27 PM, Jan Lahoda wrote:
> >> Hello Eugene,
> >>
> >> Could you please try JDK 9 b73? The kulla-0.710-20150722005843.jar
> >> should work with that.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>      Jan
> >>
> >> On 22.7.2015 19:06, Eugene Zhuravlev wrote:
> >>> Hello all,
> >>>
> >>> I was trying to launch Kulla console using binaries downloaded from the
> >>> OpenJDK Cloudbees Build farm, but it fails to start because native
> >>> library "ne" cannot be found:
> >>>
> >>> C:\java\kulla>C:\java\jdk190\bin\java -jar
> >>> kulla-0.710-20150722005843.jar
> >>> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: no le in
> >>> java.library.path
> >>>          at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(ClassLoader.java:1860)
> >>>          at java.lang.Runtime.loadLibrary0(Runtime.java:874)
> >>>          at java.lang.System.loadLibrary(System.java:1111)
> >>>          at jdk.internal.jline.WindowsTerminal.<clinit>
> >>>
> >>> Neither kulla-0.710-20150722005843.jar nor JDK9 build I have (build
> >>> 1.9.0-ea-b72) does not include this native library.
> >>>
> >>> So my questions are:
> >>> 1. Is Kulla available as a separate distribution that can be used with
> >>> currently released JDK versions (e.g. java 8)?
> >>> 2. Is it possible to get a binary java distribution for windows that is
> >>> runnable with latest officially available JDK9 builds or I need to
> >>> build
> >>> a dedicated jdk9 distribution that includes Kulla?
> >>>
> >>> Thank you in advance for any help on this.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> !DSPAM:7,55affcaa211611380419189!
> >>
>




More information about the kulla-dev mailing list