A reminder of Project Lambda's scope

[Jesse Kuhnert]

This ~is~ oracle we're talking about here, given the opportunity to
screw something up it's hard to imagine which way it went.  Maybe my
only interactions with them being in the context of uncle sam left an
unfair impression though.

I also remember reading something about "if it ever makes it out of
here" in reference to forming an expert group.. Sounds like it either
isn't happening or they are oddly confident in whatever spec they've
chosen to follow.

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:00 AM, Stephen Colebourne
<scolebourne at joda.org> wrote:
> On 14 April 2010 05:20, Neal Gafter <neal at gafter.com> wrote:
>> 2010-06-03 JKD7 "feature complete" in the master workspace
>> 2010-05-21 Last TL integration preceding FC
>> 2010-05-20 Last minute integration of project lambda implementation
>> 2010-05-06 Final draft spec for all included features distributed for
>> (successful) 2-week review
>> 2010-04-22 Semifinal draft spec with all included features distributed for
>> 2-week review
>
> I would also note that Neal's proposed schedule allows no time to
> change the Java SE libraries to use lambdas where appropriate, which
> is another large, and just as important, piece of work.
>
> Stephen
>
>