yet another function types syntax variation
Peter Levart
peter.levart at marand.si
Tue Feb 9 01:45:33 PST 2010
This time a variation of the proposed (prefix) notation which goes like:
FunctionType:
'#' ReturnType '(' ParameterTypes_opt ')' Throws_opt
What would happen if the '#' and 'ReturnType' changed places?
FunctionType:
ReturnType '#' '(' ParameterTypes_opt ')' Throws_opt
Nested return types might look better:
##int(byte[],int,int)(throws IOException)(File)(throws IOException)
vs.
int #(byte[],int,int) throws IOException #(File) throws IOException
Here the '#' is in the place where a method name is expected, so everything on the left of '#' is a return type. One might prefer puting an optional space between ReturnType and '#' to make it visualy lighter. Using '|' instead of ',' between throws types eliminates the need for a second pair of parens.
What do you think?
Regards, Peter
More information about the lambda-dev
mailing list