Clarification request: is it #int(int, int)(throws IOException, SQLException) or something else?
Reinier Zwitserloot
reinier at zwitserloot.com
Tue Jun 1 03:58:50 PDT 2010
The spec v0.1.5 (is that the latest version?) seems ambiguous (or perhaps
just confusingly worded) in regards to the syntax for multiple checked
exception types in a closure type. Or I'm having trouble reading it.
Is it:
A) #int(int, int)(throws IOException | SQLException) [parens, bar]
B) #int(int, int)(throws IOException, SQLException) [parens, comma]
C) #int(int, int) throws IOException | SQLException [no parens, bar]
D) #int(int, int) throws IOException, SQLException [no parens, comma -
this would be unparsable syntax]
E) #int(int, int)(IOException, SQLException) [no throws, comma]
F) #int(int, int)(IOException | SQLException) [no throws, bar]
Versions A, B en E all occur in the spec, between clarifications, examples,
and official syntax. I'm fairly sure version C has been discussed on this
mailing list before.
--Reinier Zwitserloot
More information about the lambda-dev
mailing list