Clarification request: is it #int(int, int)(throws IOException, SQLException) or something else?

[Alex Buckley]

On 6/1/2010 3:58 AM, Reinier Zwitserloot wrote:
> Is it:
> 
> A) #int(int, int)(throws IOException | SQLException)   [parens, bar]
> B) #int(int, int)(throws IOException, SQLException)    [parens, comma]
> C) #int(int, int) throws IOException | SQLException    [no parens, bar]
> D) #int(int, int) throws IOException, SQLException     [no parens, comma -
> this would be unparsable syntax]
> E) #int(int, int)(IOException, SQLException)              [no throws, comma]
> F) #int(int, int)(IOException | SQLException)              [no throws, bar]
> 
> Versions A, B en E all occur in the spec, between clarifications, examples,
> and official syntax. I'm fairly sure version C has been discussed on this
> mailing list before.

B. The fundamental unit is the existing Throws production, which is then 
parenthesized. You're right about an erroneous instance of A; it will be 
removed.

Alex