[gathering-options] Arrow symbol
Stephen Colebourne
scolebourne at joda.org
Thu Jun 23 12:55:57 PDT 2011
Summary after 1 day of "gathering options":
(I've added more examples, using what I believe to be reasonable
variants of two syntax families, please don't argue too much based on
the rest of the syntax I used, just focus on the "arrow")
----------------------------------------
Standard single line examples:
Use ->
{x -> x + 1}
(x) -> {x + 1}
Use =>
{x => x + 1}
(x) => {x + 1}
Use :
{x : x + 1}
(x) : {x + 1}
Use |
{x | x + 1}
(x) | {x + 1}
----------------------------------------
Alternate single line examples:
Use ->
{ -> 42}
{x -> {y -> x + y}}
() -> {42}
x -> {y -> {x + y}}
x -> y -> x + y
Use =>
{ => 42}
{x => {y => x + y}}
() => {42}
x => {y => {x + y}}
x => y => x + y
Use :
{ : 42}
{x : {y : x + y}}
() : {42}
x : {y : {x + y}}
x : y : x + y
Use |
{ | 42}
{x | {y | x + y}}
() | {42}
x | {y | {x + y}}
x | y | x + y
----------------------------------------
Multi-line examples:
Use ->
{x, y ->
if (x > y) {
return x;
}
return y;
}
Use =>
{x, y =>
if (x > y) {
return x;
}
return y;
}
Use :
{x, y :
if (x > y) {
return x;
}
return y;
}
Use |
{x, y |
if (x > y) {
return x;
}
return y;
}
----------------------------------------
- This thread is for GATHERING OPTIONS, not voting or discussing.
- You should only suggest an option if you personally prefer it to the
-> or => symbol
- You MUST include the two (original) examples converted to use your
preferred symbol
- Suggesting a symbol does not imply that you want any syntax with an
arrow (ie. you can prefer strawman family, but suggest an arrow
symbol)
- Don't reply just to say "I don't want an arrow symbol"
- Don't reply to propose a syntax that is completely different to one
of the four syntax families
This is the *final call* for arrow proposals.
Stephen
More information about the lambda-dev
mailing list