[gathering-options] Arrow symbol
Mark Thornton
mthornton at optrak.com
Sat Jun 25 00:16:14 PDT 2011
On 24/06/11 22:03, David M. Lloyd wrote:
> To save others the trouble here are the obvious unicode arrows
>> Use ?
>> {x ? x + 1}
>> (x) ? {x + 1}
>>
>> Use ?
>> {x ? x + 1}
>> (x) ? {x + 1}
>>
>> (with a larger arrow font size)
>> {x? x + 1}
>> (x)? {x + 1}
>>
>>
>>
>> Doesn't look that good in the font/size shown above
> This came across as:
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> So can't really tell what you were after. But I can say that there are
> dozens of Unicode arrows... possibly thousands of Unicode candidates all
> told. I'm not sure it's wise to open that particular can of worms.
>
The original email contained both ascii and a text/html parts. The html
encoding used character entities as shown below. I guess this is another
example of why we aren't ready for unicode in the language itself.
<pre wrap=""><font size="+1">Use↦
{x↦ x + 1}
(x)↦ {x + 1}
Use⟼
{x⟼ x + 1}
(x)⟼ {x + 1}</font>
(with a larger arrow font size)
<font size="+1"> {x<font size="+2">⟼</font> x + 1}
(x)<font size="+2">⟼</font> {x + 1}</font>
Regards,
Mark Thornton
More information about the lambda-dev
mailing list