Request for Review: CR#8001667, second attempt

[David Holmes]

On 6/12/2012 8:29 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> On 6 December 2012 06:57, Henry Jen<henry.jen at oracle.com>  wrote:
>> Please review and comment on the webrev[1] and specdiff[2].
>>
>> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~henryjen/ccc/8001667.1/webrev
>> [2]
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~henryjen/ccc/8001667.1/specdiff/overview-summary.html
>
> Are you allowed to change the copyright date?

Allowed and ultimately required.

> I also note that the generic catch-all null statement at the class
> level is less usable than a "not null" or "must be non-null" on each
> @param.

But is the existing practice in j.u

David
-----

> Stephen
>