Request for Review: CR#8001667, second attempt

Stephen Colebourne scolebourne at joda.org
Thu Dec 6 02:29:00 PST 2012


On 6 December 2012 06:57, Henry Jen <henry.jen at oracle.com> wrote:
> Please review and comment on the webrev[1] and specdiff[2].
>
> [1] http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~henryjen/ccc/8001667.1/webrev
> [2]
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~henryjen/ccc/8001667.1/specdiff/overview-summary.html

Are you allowed to change the copyright date?

I also note that the generic catch-all null statement at the class
level is less usable than a "not null" or "must be non-null" on each
@param.

Stephen


More information about the lambda-dev mailing list