FlatMapper

[Kevin Bourrillion]

Tardy, but:  the Googlers I ran this by all felt just fine with "mapInto".
 Sure, you can map *multiple, *but that fact just didn't seem overly
necessary to force into the name.

On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 12:29 PM, Joe Bowbeer <joe.bowbeer at gmail.com> wrote:

> flattenInto gets my vote
> On Feb 17, 2013 11:09 AM, "Remi Forax" <forax at univ-mlv.fr> wrote:
>
>> On 02/17/2013 08:07 PM, Brian Goetz wrote:
>>
>>> flattenInto seems the best so far.
>>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Rémi
>>
>>
>>> On 2/17/2013 9:36 AM, Tim Peierls wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Remi Forax <forax at univ-mlv.fr
>>>> <mailto:forax at univ-mlv.fr>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     mapAndFlattenInto is a little to verbose for me, mapAndFlat ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No, has to be a verb.
>>>>
>>>> I'd still understand flattenInto, leaving the mapping part to be implied
>>>> by the type name.
>>>>
>>>> --tim
>>>>
>>>
>>


-- 
Kevin Bourrillion | Java Librarian | Google, Inc. | kevinb at google.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/lambda-libs-spec-experts/attachments/20130221/f0167419/attachment-0001.html